Advanced ML workflow with available Jupyter Notebook using computer vision, AWS SageMaker and MLFlow to benchmark industry visual anomaly models.
Last updated
Was this helpful?
Created By: Mathieu Lescaudron
Public Project Link: https://studio.edgeimpulse.com/public/376268/latest
GitHub Repo: https://github.com/emergy-official/anomaly.parf.ai
Let's explore the development and optimization of a cloud-based visual anomaly detection model designed for edge deployments, featuring real-time and serverless inference.
We will cover the following topics:
Datasets: Creation of our own datasets.
Models: Development of three different models:
A baseline model + usage of BYOM (Bring Your Own Model on Edge Impulse),
Efficient AD model,
FOMO AD model by Edge Impulse (automated).
Web App:
Setting up a real-time and serverless inference endpoint,
Dataset explorer,
Automating deployments with GitHub Actions and Terraform on AWS.
This is a demo project. All code is provided for you to implement any or all parts yourself.
Imagine we are a commercial baking company that produces cookies. Our goal is to sort cookies to identify those with and without defects (anomalies), so that any broken cookies do not get packaged and sent to retailers.
We are developing a cloud-based proof-of-concept to understand the feasibility of this technique, before deploying it on edge devices.
Although this is only a hypothetical example and demonstration, this quality inspection process and computer vision workflow could absolutely be leveraged by large-scale food service providers, commercial kitchens that make packaged retail food items, or any many other mass-produced retail products even beyond the food industry.
We assume we don't have access to Onmiverse Replicator to create a synthetic dataset. Instead, we manually create our own. The first step is to carefully review which cookies to eat use.
We'll create three datasets using three different types of cookies:
One with texture,
One thicker cookie,
One plain cookie.
Each dataset will consist of 200 images, totaling 600 images:
100 without any anomalies
100 with anomalies
50 easy to recognize with a clear, strong separation down the middle,
25 medium difficulty with a separation that has no gap,
25 hard to detect, with small defects and knife marks.
We take around five pictures of each cookie, making slight rotations each time. Here's the result:
Each picture, taken from a mobile phone in a 1:1 ratio with an original size of 2992 x 2992 pixels, is resized to 1024 x 1024 pixels using mogrify command from ImageMagick. It saves computing resources for both the training process and the inference endpoint:
The folder structure looks like this:
You can download the datasets here (95MB) and the raw images here (1GB)
The first model we will develop will be our baseline, serving as our starting point.
It consists of a categorical image classification using a pre-trained MobileNet.
This is Categorical (rather than binary) classification to allow for the addition of more categories of anomalies in the future.
Have a look at the training in this notebook
Here's how the images are distributed for this model:
Training: 144 images (72%)
Validation: 16 images (8%)
Test: 40 images (20%)
Both "anomaly" and "no anomaly" images are used during training.
The model is trained on a Mac using the CPU, running through 50 epochs.
You can find the results in the Step 3: Benchmarking section.
With Edge Impulse's Bring Your Own Model feature, you can easily upload your own model and use all their features.
In our case, let's use a Jupyter notebook that converts the Baseline model to a MacOS version using the Edge Impulse API. (You can do it for a specific edge device, linux, web assembly, etc). It can save you quite some time compared to doing it yourself.
You can find detailed steps in this notebook (scroll down to the section titled Edge Impulse conversion)
First, start by importing the Edge Impulse Python SDK. Then load your project's API KEY.
After that, define the input and output types for your model:
And then, convert it to the format that fits your needs (in this case, MacOS for the demo):
You'll need to make it executable by using the command chmod +x baseline.eim. And you're all set! Create an inference function to use it with this model:
Let's use another method called EfficientAD (detailed in a study from arXiv.org).
EfficientAD employs an autoencoder paired with a student-teacher approach to quickly and effectively identify anomalies in images.
Take a look at their video presentation for a brief overview.
The network, named PDN (Patch Description Network), includes a design with 4 convolutional layers and 2 pooling layers. It examines each segment of the 33 x 33 pixel image and produces a feature vector of 384 values.
Two models, student and teacher are trained on the same data. The teacher model guides the student model by providing a loss function which helps the student to improve their performance in detecting anomalies.
Anomaly detection during testing is measurable when the student model fails to predict the characteristics of an image. EfficientAD introduces an autoencoder that gives a broader view of the image, improving the overall performance of the detection in addition to the Student-Teacher method.
We're going to reuse some of the code from nelson1425/EfficientAD and update it to suit our needs. You can find the updated code here.
We will test different parameters to build a model that performs well. In the study, they used 70,000 iterations (steps) and pretrained weights from WideResNet-101.
We will experiment different numbers of steps, enabling or disabling the pretrained weights and using the small or medium size of the patch description network (the medium size includes another layer and twice as many features). Each test is called an experiment, and we will use MLFlow to log the parameters and store their results, including the scores and the models.
To run a MLFlow server, either locally or remotely, use the following command:
Here, we're using the --artifacts-destination argument to specify where to store our models. You can omit this argument if you're not using a S3 bucket on AWS, and it will default to storing the models on the disk.
In your code, you define an experiment like this:
We primarily use MLFlow to track experiments and store artifacts, although it offers many other powerful features including model registry, model deployments, model serving, and more.
You can find the full setup instructions for MLFlow for this demo here.
Let's train our models in the cloud using our notebook. We are using a Jupyter notebook, or you could also use a Python script.
There are many different cloud providers that allow you to train a model. We will use an AWS instance that includes an Nvidia Tesla 4 GPU.
The specific instance type we use is g4dn.xlarge. To get access to this instance, you need to create a support ticket requesting access to the type G instance type in your region. It will cost us 0.526 USD per hour and we plan to use it for approximately 3h.
For our setup, we'll use a pre-configured AMI with PyTorch named Deep Learning OSS Nvidia Driver AMI GPU PyTorch 2.2.0.
Here is the CLI:
The complete commands used are detailed here
Once you've connected to the instance using ssh and cloned the repository along with the datasets, you can run the following command to start the jupyter notebook:
Make sure you've enabled port forwarding so you can connect to the remote Jupyter notebook locally:
You can now access Jupyter Notebook on the remote instance from your local computer.
For the training, we will only use the images without anomalies. Here's how the data is distributed:
Training
No anomaly: 72 images (36%)
Validation
No Anomaly: 8 images (4%)
Anomaly: 20 images (10%)
Testing
No Anomaly: 20 images (10%)
Anomaly: 80 images (40%)
Once it is trained, you can see the different results in MLFlow:
And you can create graphics to build reports:
For the cookies dataset three, the best model used 3,200 steps, pretrained weights, and the small network. In the study, they used 70,000 steps. We added early stopping based on the F1 score from the evaluation dataset. Modify this for your needs.
We use the same config for training datasets one and two.
Here's an example of the inference results with EfficientAD. It localizes the anomaly within the image through a heatmap.
Once you're finished, terminate the remote instance. You can find the results in the Step 3: Benchmarking section.
The last model we will build is called FOMO-AD, a visual anomaly detection learning block developed by Edge Impulse. It's based on the FOMO architecture, specifically designed for constrained devices.
Check the FOMO-AD documentation for more information.
Let's automate the entire process using the Edge Impulse API:
Import the dataset,
Create an impulse,
Generate features,
Train the model,
Export the model.
There's too much code to detail here, if you want to replicate it yourself step by step, check out this notebook
We separate our dataset as follows:
Training set
No Anomaly: 80 images (40%)
Testing set
No Anomaly: 20 images (10%)
Anomaly: 100 images (50%)
The best part of the notebook is that it includes a pre-built pipeline in Edge Impulse that will Find the best Visual AD Model using our dataset. All you need to do is provide the dataset and run the pipeline. After that, you'll have the optimal model set up in your project, and you can find the best threshold to use in the logs (Refer to the Option 2 section in the notebook for more details).
Edge Impulse lets you classify your entire dataset or just one image at a time:
Once the model is exported, you can create an inference function in Python to run it locally:
Now that we've trained all the models, it's time to evaluate how well they perform using the F1 Score. (The F1 Score is a way to measure a model's accuracy, taking into account both precision and recall).
Take a look at this notebook where all the benchmarking is done.
Since each model was trained on different sets of data, we will use the test dataset from EfficientAD model for comparison.
Here are the results, tested on a Macbook:
FOMO-AD performs the best in most datasets. Although EfficientAD could be improved to score higher, it would require more time.
For additional details on performance, including difficulty, time, and RAM usage, check out this notebook. Usually, the inference time of Efficient AD is 300ms, whereas FOMO AD is 35ms.
The EfficientAD model should be used by modern GPUs, where the inference time is about 3ms.
The models are trained and ready to be used, so let's build an app to showcase our proof of concept.
We'll include two features:
A serverless endpoint using SageMaker Serverless Inference with EfficientAD,
A real-time inference using a compact version of the Edge Impulse mobile client with FOMO-AD.
In the public repository, you will find:
The API Code,
The Website Code.
This is the infrastructure of our serverless inference endpoint:
When a user uploads an image to get the anomaly result, it will go through:
Cloudfront (which is also used by the front end. Users are redirected to the API Gateway when the request path matches /api*),
An API Gateway (to communicate with Lambda and allows for future API expansions),
A Lambda that communicate to the SageMaker endpoint securely,
A Serverless SageMaker endpoint (executes the inference using a Docker container).
The SageMaker endpoint operates using a Docker image. You can build your dockerfile like this:
Then, upload the Docker image to an ECR repository (an Elastic Container Registry).
You can also test the inference locally without using Docker:
Check out the terraform code to configure the SageMaker endpoint, or you can do it manually in the AWS Console.
The serverless inference is quite slow (12 sec per inference), you can speed this up this by increasing the RAM usage, switching to a provisioned endpoint, or using a real-time endpoint within AWS. However, these options will increase the cost. The actual setup cost $ 0.20 per 1,000 inferences, an affordable way for creating demos without impacting your wallet.
If you've previously played with Edge Impulse, you might be familiar with the Launch in browser feature that lets you test your model in real-time.
Wouldn't it be great to include this feature directly in our web app?
Thanks to Edge Impulse, this feature is open source!
The way it work is that the client is downloading a web assembly .zip file of the model using the Edge Impulse API from your project's API KEY. Then, it unzips the export and loads the model along with multiple scripts to enable real-time inference.
We're going to modify this a bit.
We’ll no longer use the API KEY.
We’ll include the web assembly zip file directly in the website’s assets. (you can download this file manually from Edge Impulse, or it can be downloaded automatically using the API when building the website assets),
We'll keep only the essential code and update what's needed to make it work the new way,
We'll add a colormap function for fun to show the model's confidence.
This is what we obtain:
All the modifications are detailed here in the Mobile Client compressed version detail section.
For the website, we're using Astro with React based on the AstroWind template.
To automatically deploy the website, we use this github action. It triggers a deployment whenever the commit message includes deploy:website.
The website is hosted on AWS within an S3 bucket and is behind a Cloudfront distribution.
It also features a dataset explorer that showcases the data used for benchmarking:
It includes all the images, scores, predictions, and timings for all the models and cookies.
One key improvement could be enhancing the dataset. We used a mobile phone with a combination of natural and artificial lighting. The model's performance might improve if you create a synthetic dataset using Onmiverse Replicator featuring different lighting conditions, backgrounds, and more.
It will eliminate manual processing, and you won't need to run 10 km to burn off all the cookies you've eaten.